Understanding the Sanctuary City Challenge
America faces a significant immigration crisis, coupled with a troubling disregard for the rule of law. According to the Department of Homeland Security, over 560 jurisdictions currently function as sanctuary cities. These cities not only bypass federal authority but also inadvertently empower criminals, hinder law enforcement efforts, and ultimately place innocent Americans in jeopardy.
The Solution is Clear
Although some may feel secure in their sanctuary policies, a remedy exists. President Trump previously demonstrated an effective approach to addressing entities that resist federal mandates. For instance, when Columbia University ignored issues of antisemitism, the Trump administration responded by freezing its federal funding, ultimately leading to compliance. This same strategy could be employed to dismantle sanctuary policies one city at a time.
Financial Pressure and Legal Accountability
We must adopt a strategic response reminiscent of Trump’s actions, using financial pressures and legal methods to reinforce the rule of law.
Consequences of Sanctuary Policies
Sanctuary cities not only obstruct immigration enforcement but also compel taxpayers to finance an influx of individuals that may contribute to rising crime rates. This trend suggests a top-down approach, where blue cities and states cultivate an environment of lawlessness. As a result, public safety is often sacrificed for political gains.
A Legal Immigrant’s Perspective
As an attorney and legal immigrant who deeply values the American Dream, I am concerned about the implications of these policies. For example, between June 2023 and July 2024, the New York City Department of Correction acted on merely 4% of ICE detention requests. Consequently, thousands of violent offenders slipped through the cracks, leading to tragic consequences, including the murder of an off-duty Customs and Border Protection officer.
California’s Struggles with Lawlessness
California’s Democratic leadership similarly shields against accountability. Since 2022, the state has rejected over 13,000 ICE detainer requests, including 72 tied to homicide charges. The chaos seen during the violent protests in Los Angeles in 2025 further highlighted a deliberate failure to maintain order.
The Need for Accountability
Local leaders’ refusal to enforce immigration laws sends a troubling message regarding public safety. They disguise their actions as compassionate, but the safety of law-abiding citizens must also be prioritized. We must inquire: Who truly benefits from these sanctuary cities?
The Dangers of Defiance
America stands as a nation grounded in law, not in loopholes. The growing sanctuary city movement, which places ideology above enforcement, jeopardizes this foundation. If these cities can disregard immigration laws today, what’s to stop them from ignoring other federal regulations in the future?
A Proven Strategy
President Trump has already illustrated a successful blueprint. In 2025, his administration held Columbia University responsible for mishandling taxpayer funds amid violations of Title VI regarding antisemitism. When the university refused to comply, $400 million in federal funding was frozen. This led to a swift agreement on reforms totaling $221 million.
Proposed Actions Against Sanctuary Cities
- Defunding Sanctuary Cities: In January 2017, Trump signed an order permitting the federal government to withhold DOJ and DHS grants. Following this, California faced a $200 million loss in federal funds, which motivated compliance.
- Legal Action Under the Supremacy Clause: Trump’s DOJ previously sued California in 2018 for its sanctuary law, prompting significant changes. New lawsuits against sanctuary jurisdictions like New York City are now underway, aiming for stricter enforcement and accountability of local officials.
Conclusion
We deserve leaders who prioritize the safety of citizens and enforce our laws. America thrives when its laws are respected, as they form the backbone of the nation. By defunding and pursuing legal actions against sanctuary cities, Trump could guide these jurisdictions back into compliance, protecting citizens while instilling a lasting message about the rule of law.
